background image

Leaders in Brand Transformation™

Archive for the ‘Brand Identity’ Category

Great Brands don’t suck

June 16th, 2010 by Dan Bergeron - Filed Under: Brand Experience, Brand Identity, Marketing

I recently attended the Art of Marketing (#taom) conference here in Calgary, and had a chance to take in some amazing speakers discussing the latest in marketing trends and creativity. One of the thoughts that stuck with me was ‘The path to building a great brand starts with not sucking’. Yes folks, I also believe it is just that simple. You can only live behind a veil of beautiful design for so long until suckiness starts to ooze through if you aren’t sincere in your actions, and committed to providing quality in both your product and your customer experience.

Thanks Art of Marketing!

AGRI-TREND is Recognized Among the 2010 REBRAND 100 Global Awards Winners

March 5th, 2010 by Dan Bergeron - Filed Under: Brand Identity, Client Success, RFX News

March 05, 2010— The AGRI-TREND Group of Companies was named one of the world’s most effective rebrands in the sixth annual REBRAND 100® Global Awards. REBRAND 100 is the highest recognition for excellence in brand repositioning, and is the first and only global, juried program of its kind. RFX Brand + Communications’ rebrand of AGRI-TREND encompasses a strategic reorganization of the various brands, an overall simplification, and development of a strategic road map to accommodates future growth.

“I am genuinely impressed with the work from this year’s REBRAND 100 Global entrants,” said Callison Executive Vice President and 2010 juror, Paula Stafford. “It is apparent companies are working hard to provide a 360 degree, comprehensive brand language. They see the value and strength of consistency, clarity of identity and message in reaching their respective audiences. Some entries were spot on in connecting with their targeted customers, patients and clients.”

To select winners, a new, international panel of industry experts convenes yearly to review the best of the submissions. They consider “before” and “after” images of brand transformations with written summaries. Emphasis was on executed strategy that made an emotional connection, and met the stated objectives and needs of the identified target market. Jurors were unaware of the brand strategist’s name and size when reviewing the projects. Consequently, a small consulting firm had as much opportunity to be selected as did global organizations.

Over 36 industries and 29 countries are represented among the 2010 winners. They ranged from the City of Pula’s Office of Tourism in Croatia to Nike, and Walmart, the worlds largest retailer. Some of the competing brand consultants included Interbrand, Radley Yeldar, Lippincott, and Siegel+Gale, in addition to in-house teams, small agencies, and representatives of multinational corporations. The rebrand could have been an enterprise-wide effort, a change in a single brand component, or a brand extension.

The 2010 panel of 10 included Friederike Biegel, Director of Strategy, Peter Schmidt Group in Germany; Founder, Director & Principal Designer; Ashwini Deshpande of India-based Elephant Strategy + Design; Uche Nworah, Channel Brand Manger for Glo; Andrew Gorman, Creative Director, Radley Yeldar, and Kit Hinrichs, former Pentagram Partner and founder Studio-Hinrichs.

About The AGRI-TREND Group of Companies.
AGRI-TREND has 4 main operating divisions servicing agricultural clients across Canada, the US and as far away as Australia. AGRI-TREND has expertise in Agronomy, Carbon Credits, Grain Marketing, and Precision Farming. In addition, they have also developed an industry leading data management platform, tailored exclusively for their clients. To learn more about AGRI-TREND, visit them online at www.agritrend.com.

About REBRAND™ and the REBRAND 100® Global Awards:
REBRAND™ is the first, and only expert-led, global resource focused on brand transformations. Its REBRAND 100® Global Awards, is the highest, recognition for excellence in brand repositioning. Featured in such media as The Wall Street Journal, CNN Money, BusinessWeek, and Yahoo! Finance, the annual awards has entry deadlines in late September. View case studies from numerous industries at www.rebrand.com

Why Rebrand?

November 6th, 2009 by Dan Bergeron - Filed Under: Brand Equity, Brand Experience, Brand Identity, Brand Positioning

There nothing we enjoy more than helping to guide an organization through the rebrand process. Usually (always) organization have already set the mandate for ‘why’ they are going through this process. Here are a few reasons why a company should consider a rebrand (and a couple of  reasons why you shouldn’t).

1. Relevance: Companies and brands need to stay relevant to their target audience, and let’s face it, audiences change. When your target evolves and starts to sniff out competitors, it may be because they feel their first preference (you) is no longer relevant. Rebrands in this case often are accompanied by new product offerings.

2. Mergers & Acquisitions: When 2 companies are combined, there are likely 2 unique audiences left to communicate to. Sometimes it is a matter of re-packaging the company / brand in a way that will appeal to both. In other cases however, one of the brands may remain dominant, and simply go through a refresh.

3. Innovation: Technology surely evolves faster than any brand, and if your company / brand is dependent upon technology and you are consistently innovating, then a rebrand should follow your natural path of innovation. It is an outward expression of your companies evolution and will keep audiences coming back to see ‘what’s new’.

4. Reposition: Taking a brand to a new position is difficult (value to premium for example), and requires a company to think about the new audience they are hoping to acquire. They likely have a different DNA than the old audience, and it’s often best to re-launch a brand to target this new demographic. Often, brands will not necessarily rebrand a current label, but rather create a new freestanding brand to float into the market.

5. Rejuvenation: The greatest brands in the world consistently update and refresh their look to stay contemporary and fresh. We find that 10 years is often the max threshold for consideration of a rebrand. In cases where a company has a 25 year old ‘look’, they will probably find themselves looking over their shoulder often at the up and coming brands who are demonstrating innovation and business evolution. If you have the mind set of ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ (pardon my backwoods grammar), I would encourage you to consider a ‘brand refresh’. This maintains and celebrates the history and heritage of your brand, but shows your audience (current and future) that you are adaptive to change.

6. Outgrowth: Small companies can become big companies if they’re good at what they do, but small companies often start with meager logo’s & visuals. This is mainly for budget reasons (or perhaps their artistically oriented nephew was commissioned for the original design in exchange for a box of shiny new pencil crayons). There comes a point when a company will become more sophisticated then the look they are carrying, and that is usually the best time to rebrand.

Reasons NOT to rebrand

1. Too young: If you’ve unrolled a company or brand to the marketplace in the past 3 years, it’s probably not the best time to rebrand. It takes time to evolve a brand into something genuine and unique, and it’s wise to avoid the costly process of rebranding to try and ‘sell’ more. Often, a different approach to marketing or new campaign can help.

2. Change for the sake of change: It’s not a great idea to rebrand if the only reason you have is because you ‘want’ to. If there is no new innovation, attitude, behavior or product position, then consumers will be left with a flat experience. Imagine if a restaurant sells crummy food, and start to lose market share. They decide to rebrand to bring people back, yet still sell the same crummy food. This is a sure recipe for failure (no pun intended) as they’ll almost certainly lose that customer for life.

Really Great Re-Brands

October 7th, 2009 by Dan Bergeron - Filed Under: Brand Equity, Brand Experience, Brand Identity, Creative Campaigns, RFX News

Most awards in the agency world honour outstanding achievement in creative direction, advertising concept, campaign effectiveness and so on. There aren’t too many that honour excellence in Re-Branding, but I was lucky to stumble upon a great resource and organization dedicated only to reviewing the merits of re-brands. The site is rebrand.com, and if you review the winners categories, you will find some amazing examples of very successful (and creative) rebrand efforts. Thanks rebrand.com!

The truth about logos

October 7th, 2009 by Dan Bergeron - Filed Under: Brand Identity, Brand Positioning

Logo’s are a funny thing. In our world (the creative world), we get commissioned to design them, often with the expectation that we are building a ‘brand’ for our customer. The fact is, we aren’t building a brand, we are merely building the signature that their brand will carry. We naturally assume that because of the mass exposure to world class brands (say Starbucks for example), that their logos were designed, and greatness instantly followed. Not True. Logos often (if not always) precede legendary brands, and it’s the behaviour, product quality, reputation and buzz that truly builds the logo into well recognized signatures for these great brands. That’s not to say that the right logo isn’t important, or even critical to future success.

Logo’s are a critical piece of the puzzle and here’s why. Before a brand has a chance to achieve greatness, it is judged thousands of times over. It sets the tone for how the brand is positioned. It gives visual queues to the consumer on what they should ‘expect’ from that brand. If the brand is set to hold a premium position in the market place, then the design should reflect a premium look. Consumers will expect to pay premium pricing, and you will eliminate pesky non consumers (cheapskates) from the mix. If the logo is designed to be the value leader, a simpler, slightly more generic look is often best. Take a look around and you can see the difference, KIA versus Mercedes, Banana Republic versus Wal-Mart. Coca Cola versus the ‘house’ brand.

Ultimately, a logo’s job is to set expectations, and be a unique signature for an organization. More importantly it represents the position the company expects to hold (we refer to it as relevance). If it doesn’t, you may have only 2 choices; re-brand or re-position. More on both topics in future posts!


Top of Page